Real Facts behind Pawan - Sampat Combo

Pawan Kalyan is a brand above stardom. Over years, his image scaled to new highs and strong reason to happen that is his character better taught among Fans as Pawanism. Ever since Pawan accepted Sampat Nandi as director for ‘Gabbar Singh 2,’ for the first time there are various calculations and random, rotten speculations spread across media indirectly questioning the fundamental personality of Power Star. May it be Caste factor or scarcely creative dosed ‘Rachcha’ factor, definitely the name of Sampat was also put to discussion.

However, our close sources surrounding ‘GS 2’ project wriggled out some actual facts on what really made Pawan to accept Sampat. Though typical and conventional, it is just sincerity, hard-work, dedication and single-mindedness of Sampat won him the deal. Post ‘Rachcha,’ when there are numerous fancy offers knocking the young director’s door, he was focused on only goal to narrate a story and take acceptance from Pawan for a project. For this, it took a complete year and Power Star obviously has the intellectual sense to observe and gauge on what are ins and outs of Sampat's talent. 

If not…when there is a queue of star directors’ right from VV Vinayak to star writers like Kona Venkat waiting for Pawan, how Sampat alone ran away with envious offer? Yes, it’s the perfect match of frequencies and ideologies between these two. Right to our general notion, Pawan does not accept regular, beaten commercial concepts. Even if he does, there will be a strong message as under-current. (Of course, this quality in his films gave rise to theory of Pawanism). 

With such strong facts on Pawan’s individual character popularized in entire Tollywood market, where do these gossips on Caste and Creed find applicability in the combination? Well, does anybody of you know…what is the Caste of Puri Jagannath or Bheemaneni Srinivas Rao or Harish Shankar or SJ Suryah or even Vishnuvardhan? More than Fans, even anti-Fans and general audience will now get an idea on ‘Pawanism.’ Isn’t it folks?