Paper Tigers better than Jagan and KCR

In the heart of India's political landscape, a narrative unfolds around the conduct of political leaders, particularly Jagan Mohan Reddy and KCR. The expectations placed upon them to represent their constituencies within the legislative assemblies are met with a curious mix of presence and absence, bravery and reluctance. Herein lies a tale of leadership, accountability, and the arena of political engagements.

#### The Absent Leader: Jagan Mohan Reddy's Conundrum

Jagan Mohan Reddy, the leader who once exuded confidence and resilience, likening himself to a solitary lion, a pack of wolves, and the mighty Arjuna ready to face any Padma Vyuham, appears to have faltered. Elected to serve and lead as the opposition, Jagan's conspicuous absence from the legislative sessions is a matter of public discourse. From the comfort of Tadepalli Palace, he orchestrates media conferences, accusing the Chief Minister, Chandrababu Naidu, of deceit and falsehoods—allegations made with a half-hearted fervor. This dichotomy between bold pre-election promises and quiet post-election retreat raises questions about his commitment to his legislative duties.

#### Chandrababu Naidu: A Courageous Contrast

Contrastingly, Chandrababu Naidu, despite his age and the might of the YCP Kaurava army, fearlessly confronts the adversities within the legislative assembly. His determination and courage in the face of political opposition set a precedent for political engagement and leadership. Even during KCR's tenure as Chief Minister, Congress MLAs, including Revanth Reddy, demonstrated similar bravery by regularly attending legislative sessions, underscoring the importance of active participation in the democratic process.

#### KCR's Dual Approach

KCR, the Chief Minister of Telangana, exhibits a dual approach. While he showers praise on Nehru, Indira Gandhi, and Prime Minister Modi, he, like Jagan, is hesitant to attend legislative sessions himself. His declaration of tearing the Telangana budget in the assembly was met with a non-appearance—prompting questions from Revanth Reddy and ministers to Harish Rao and KTR. However, unlike Jagan, KCR ensures that his MLAs attend the assembly sessions, maintaining a semblance of representation.

#### The Challenge of Engagement

Chandrababu Naidu and Revanth Reddy have issued a challenge to Jagan and KCR, urging them to "step into the assembly and speak" rather than criticizing from the outside. This call for direct engagement is a testament to the belief that true leadership requires active participation in the legislative process, where decisions are made and accountability is demanded.

#### The Courage of Leadership

The question that lingers is, do Jagan and KCR possess the courage to face the assembly and its adversities? Their reluctance suggests that the courage they claim may be contingent upon positions of power and authority. In the absence of such positions, do they lack the resolve to participate fully in the democratic process? The saga continues, as the political landscape awaits their response to the call for direct and active engagement.

### Concluding Thoughts

The saga of Jagan Mohan Reddy and KCR highlights the complex interplay between leadership, accountability, and public expectations. As the narrative unfolds, it serves as a reminder that true leadership requires not only bold words but also active engagement in the legislative process—where the real work of governance is carried out. The story of Jagan and KCR remains open, inviting them to step into the arena of legislative assemblies and prove their mettle as leaders.