Did you know?
* Recently, Natasimham Nandamuri Balakrishna made derogatory remarks against India's highest civilian award Bharat Ratna in Telugu news channels. Shockingly, there were no debates and discussions against Balakrishna. For time being, just imagine if Megastar Chiranjeevi or Power Star Pawan Kalyan made those comments. What could have happened? Like never before, there were earth-shattering debates round the clock in the media.
* Two years ago, Balakrishna abused the PM Narendra Modi and his mother publicly. There were no debates by the media.
* It is a common practice for Balakrishna to beat his fans black and blue during his public appearances. There were no discussions in the media.
* Balakrishna made several controversial comments about the caste previously. There was no debate in the media.
WHAT DOES MEDIA SAY FOR THIS COMPLAINT?: The media tries to defend its act saying Balakrishna is like a 'PASI BALUDU', 'KID', NAVAJAATHA SISUVU' etc.
BUT WHAT IS THE ACTUAL REASON? Media houses like TV9, TV5, ABN, Mahaa TV, ETV, NTV etc. are clearly aware of their blunder for not telecasting debates on Balakrishna's sidetracked attitude. But then, criticising Balakrishna is something like criticizing their (media) own caste. So, the media has conveniently skipped controversial debates against Balakrishna.
WHAT IS THE DISADVANTAGE OF BALAKRISHNA FOR NO DEBATES IN MEDIA?: Balakrishna, forever, is remembered as a comedian among crores of his detractors. Also, Balakrishna gets the liberty to use filthy language and derogatory remarks on anything which may harm the society.
ADVICE TO MEDIA: Media should understand the consequences encountered with their caste biased perspective in avoiding debates against Balakrishna.