There was a time when former CEO of TV 9, Ravi Prakash would conduct useless debates on unnecessary issues. Under his leadership, many harmful debates were broadcast which created unnecessary rifts between Hindus and Christians, Hindus and Muslims etc. Some more debates created rifts among people of various castes.
Ironically, the channel would boast about that it was striving for a better society.
On the other hand, some more blackmailing programmes threatened people of various sections. The channel telecast day-long live telecast on Tollywood drug mafia. Some anti social elements were deployed in the studio to abuse Power Star Pawan Kalyan. When crores of fans were mourning with the demise of late great actress Sridevi, the channel's camera entered the bath tub and analysed in which angle Sridevi breathed her last. Pathetic!!
And now, it's the turn of Ravi Prakash to get debated. He became the point for sensation. He became the masala stuff for media. And now, why shouldn't TV 9's anchor Rajinikanth conduct a big debate on Ravi Prakash's crimes and his great escape from the police? And why shouldn't Ravi Prakash's lame excuses and cock and bull stories in exile are debated? It's high time the channel should hold a big debate on Ravi Prakash's escape.