Posani Krishna Murali's attack on Chiranjeevi hinges on several key accusations:
PRP Failure: Posani highlights Chiranjeevi's past political endeavor, the Praja Rajyam Party (PRP), which despite winning 18 seats, failed to make a significant impact and was eventually merged with the Congress party. He paints Chiranjeevi as someone who abandoned his political responsibilities and betrayed the trust of voters who supported PRP.
Business Dealings: He accuses Chiranjeevi of treating politics as a mere business transaction, drawing parallels with his film career. The allegation of "trading MLAs like chicken" reinforces this image of Chiranjeevi as someone who prioritizes personal gain over public service.
Assembly Absence: Posani criticizes Chiranjeevi for not actively participating in the assembly to address people's issues, despite PRP's electoral success. This reinforces the image of Chiranjeevi as a detached and disinterested politician.
Support for Pawan Kalyan: Posani questions Chiranjeevi's motives for supporting his brother Pawan Kalyan and Janasena, insinuating that it's driven by personal ambition and a desire for power, rather than genuine concern for the people.
Posani concludes by deeming Chiranjeevi unfit for politics, employing the sarcastic remark "Emo Gurram Egaravachhu" (This horse won't climb the hill) to mock his political aspirations and chances of success.
While Posani's critique presents a scathing perspective, it's important to consider potential counterarguments and alternative viewpoints:
PRP's Challenges: The political landscape of Andhra Pradesh at the time of PRP's formation was complex, with established parties holding significant power. PRP, as a new entrant, faced numerous challenges, and its eventual merger with Congress could be interpreted as a strategic move rather than a betrayal.
Chiranjeevi's Influence: Despite PRP's limitations, Chiranjeevi's entry into politics undoubtedly impacted the political discourse and brought attention to various social issues. His star power and charisma attracted a significant following.
Support for Family: Chiranjeevi's support for Pawan Kalyan and Janasena could also be viewed as a natural extension of familial loyalty and a belief in his brother's leadership capabilities.
Ultimately, the effectiveness of Posani's critique and its impact on public perception will depend on the audience's existing political inclinations and their interpretation of Chiranjeevi's actions and intentions.