Did you know? Prince Mahesh Babu's Maharshi had done pre pre-release business $3.5M in Overseas but collected just $1.9M with almost $1.6M losses incurred by the film at the end of its full run. Likewise, his Sarileru Neekevvaru too incurred around $1M losses in the Overseas.
Despite the heavy losses incurred by both the films in Overseas, the media hid those facts considering Maharshi a hit and Sarileru Neekevvaru a super hit.
Did you also know? Power Star Pawan Kalyan's Vakeel Saab's pre-release business at the Overseas market valued to $1.2M and collected 1050K (US 750K and Australia 300K) with just 150K losses. On the other hand, the film registered a solid super hit in all other areas of India.
In fact, just 40% seating was allowed in the US for Vakeel Saab with marginal ticket prices. It was really a good performance of the film in light of the drastic spread of the pandemic and with just 40% occupancy.
But then, did you know? Some sick media houses are projecting Vakeel Saab as a huge disaster in the Overseas. If Vakeel Saab is a huge disaster, what kind of nouns and adjectives can be used for the Overseas performance of Maharshi and Sarileru Neekevvaru?
And then, what factors made that sick media houses not disclosing the super hit status of Vakeel Saab in all other areas? Why didn't these media houses encourage the precious message offered by the film to the women? Can't it be termed a serious offense by these media houses?
Meanwhile, viewers must understand the fact that whichever the media shows Vakeel Saab in a poor light is a Pro YSRCP media house.