Advertisement

High Court reprimands Vishal

Updated at:

High Court warns Vishal

High Court reprimands Vishal
High Court reprimands Vishal

High Court reprimands Vishal.Vishal, basking in the success of his recent film "Mark Antony," finds himself in a legal quagmire involving Lyca Productions, as warned by the Madras High Court. This case stems from Vishal's financial troubles, where he incurred substantial debts totaling approximately 21 crores after producing several films independently.

In an effort to alleviate his financial burden, Vishal entered into an agreement with the esteemed production house, Lyca Productions, who graciously agreed to cover his debts. As part of this arrangement, it was stipulated that Vishal's future projects would be produced under the Lyca Productions banner.

Advertisement

Regrettably, Vishal did not honor this commitment and instead chose to collaborate with other producers for his subsequent projects. Lyca Productions, feeling aggrieved by this breach of agreement, sought legal intervention and requested the court's permission to halt the release of any of Vishal's films until the matter was resolved.

However, the producer of "Mark Antony" expressed concern over being inadvertently embroiled in this dispute, as a delay in the film's release could result in significant financial losses. Consequently, the court granted permission for the film's release while the case against Vishal continued.

In response to the court's directives, Vishal was instructed to deposit 15 crores out of the outstanding 21 crores and provide comprehensive bank statements for all transactions dating from January 2021 to the present. Additionally, he was required to furnish an affidavit detailing his personal and family properties and assets by September 19th. Unfortunately, Vishal's legal counsel failed to comply with these requisites, exacerbating the situation.

This non-compliance prompted the High Court Judge to take a stern stance against Vishal for failing to adhere to court directives. Subsequently, Vishal appeared in court and requested an extension, which the court granted, affording him an additional 28 days to fulfill the court's stipulated requirements. Following this grace period, the next hearing in this case will take place in court.

Vishal must diligently adhere to all court-mandated actions within this extended timeframe; failure to do so may result in serious consequences. The legal proceedings will continue to unfold, and the outcome hinges on Vishal's compliance with the court's directives.

Tags:   VISHAL 5